Our prices are on the page. Here is what $3,000, $6,000 and $10,000 a month actually buys, and why we price by pace instead of by hours.
A lot of firms in our category keep pricing behind a sales call. We would rather you see the numbers first, so here they are, along with what actually changes between tiers.
Focus is $3,000, Momentum $6,000 and Scale $10,000 a month, priced by how many work streams run at once.
| Focus | Momentum | Scale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | $3,000 | $6,000 | $10,000 |
| Concurrent work streams | One | Two | Three |
| Working session | Monthly | Every two weeks | Weekly |
| The promise | One thing at a time, done properly | Two moving in parallel | Full throughput |
That is the whole pricing model. No hour banks, no points, no tier tied to how many HubSpot hubs you happen to own.
Hubs are the wrong unit because owning a tool is not the same as running it. In one of the two portals we audited in August 2026, a paid Marketing Hub Professional subscription sent fewer than ten marketing emails in a quarter. The license was paid for and idle. What that portal lacked was not another hub, it was a stream of work with someone accountable for moving it, which is exactly what the tiers count.
A work stream is a larger piece of work with a start and an end: a campaign build, a new automation, an integration, a reporting project. The tier is the number of those that can be in motion at the same time.
Small requests are not work streams. A copy change in an email, a form fix, a question about why a workflow did not fire: those are handled as they come and do not occupy a stream. If we counted them, you would ration them, and a client who rations questions is a client whose systems slowly drift.
At Focus you can queue as much as you like and exactly one thing moves. That constraint is the point of the tier rather than a limitation of it, and it is also the honest upgrade mechanic: when the queue is consistently longer than one stream can clear, you are a Momentum client and we will say so.
Service access is identical across the three. The tier buys pace, not a different menu. Inside the fee:
We made access identical on purpose. Feature-gated tiers push you to buy the expensive plan to unlock a capability you need once, and then you pay for it every month afterwards, the same trap as the idle license above.
Scope is controlled by three gates: a quarterly roadmap, a concurrency cap and a project threshold. A retainer with no scope control becomes an all-you-can-eat buffet and then becomes a bad relationship. None of the three requires anybody to track time.
The third one protects you more than it protects us. Without it, a forty-hour build sits inside a $3,000 month and everything else on your roadmap stops while it gets done.
One thing we deliberately do not do: credit the retainer against project fees. The ongoing service keeps running during a build, and crediting it would mean delivering that service free during exactly the months that consume the most capacity.
No minimum commitment, a 30-day opt-out, and 10% off if you choose a six-month term.
Why no minimum term? Minimums of three to six months are common in this market, and we sit below that deliberately: this line exists to fill capacity, not to protect slots, so adding friction to the start of a relationship is the wrong trade. Adding a minimum later is free. Removing one means changing a client's plan.
A working session is a scheduled block where your team does the work in HubSpot while we watch and correct in real time. It is the part of the service most likely to be misread, so it is worth being precise: your hands on the keyboard, your live work, not a hypothetical.
It is deliberately not a status call, not a presentation, and not us doing the work while you watch. Anything that turns out to be a system problem rather than a knowledge gap goes onto the roadmap instead of getting solved in the call. The output is fluency: you leave able to do it yourself.
The roadmap review is a separate meeting, on purpose. Merging the two is how prioritization quietly slips.
We sit in the middle of the market, with a higher floor than the cheapest end. Partners who publish retainer pricing tend to run from low four figures a month at entry level to low five figures at the top, and our $3,000 to $10,000 sits inside that range.
That is a deliberate position, and the reason is worth stating plainly: every hour is delivered at senior level. There is no junior bench here, which is a real constraint on our economics and a real advantage on yours. Pricing below the middle of the market while delivering senior-only would be the worst of both, so we do not.
Your tier is the number of projects that genuinely need to move at the same time. Start from the queue, not the budget. Write down everything you want changed about your marketing and revenue systems in the next quarter, group it into projects, and count the ones that genuinely need to move at the same time. That number is your tier.
If the honest count is one, start at Focus. A clearer roadmap often does more than a second stream.
A retainer is the wrong buy if you need high-volume production at a junior rate, a single build with a fixed end (ask for a project quote instead), or a one-off fix. If the honest queue is under one stream of real work, do the audit below and stop there.
We would rather you start with the diagnostic. A HubSpot Portal Audit is $1,500 flat, credited against your first month, and it tells both of us what we are actually dealing with before there is a monthly invoice involved. If your portal turns out to be in good shape, that is a useful and cheap answer.